It's easy to get hung up on one or two problems while you're taking an LSAT only to feel that you've ruined your score. But what does a missed question actually do to your score anyway?
Most people would agree that a 170 is a really high score. Does that mean that you have to be perfect to score a 170? Not at all. In fact, on most tests you can miss 10 questions and still score a 170. That's two whole games!
Now let's see what you need to get a 160. As it turns out, you can miss about 25 questions on average and still get a 160. That's an entire section! You can miss one in every four questions and still get a 160.
The key here is figuring out how many questions you need to answer correctly to get what you want. If your goal is a 160, then trying to push yourself to get a 180 is likely to cause more harm than good.
This isn't to say that you have to sell yourself short. Pick a score that you think you can get, and if you reach it, then it's time to push yourself further. But don't let an unrealistic goal stress you out and get in the way of a great goal. Besides, once you reach your goal, you can always reassess and set a higher goal. Just don't worry about that until you get there.
In the meantime, pull out a score conversion chart from a modern test (ideally PrepTests 54+). Find the score that you want. What's the raw score you need to get that LSAT score? Subtract that from 100. That number is the number of questions you can miss and still get your goal. Divide that number by 4 to see how many questions you can miss in each section. By seeing how many questions you can miss, many students start to feel more relaxed, which helps them do better on the other questions. Find a score that seems doable but that pushes you a little. Once you get that score, reassess and try again.
Keep it up, and you'll do awesome!
....
Related:
LSAT Anxiety Release Program
List of Official LSAT PrepTests
LSAT | PrepTest | Published in | |
1991 | June | 1 | |
October | 2 | TriplePrep 1 | |
December | 3 | TriplePrep 2 | |
1992 | February | 4 | TriplePrep 1 |
June | 5 | TriplePrep 1 | |
October | 6 | TriplePrep 2 | |
December | 18 | 10 Actual | |
1993 | February | 7 | 10 Actual |
June | 8 | TriplePrep 3 | |
October | 9 | 10 Actual | |
December | Released as 16 | ||
1994 | February | 10 | 10 Actual |
June | 11 | 10 Actual | |
October | 12 | 10 Actual | |
December | 13 | 10 Actual | |
1995 | February | 14 | 10 Actual |
June | 15 | 10 Actual | |
September | 16 | 10 Actual | |
December | 17 | ||
1996 | February | A | SuperPrep |
June | 19 | 10 More | |
October | 20 | 10 More | |
December | 21 | 10 More | |
1997 | February | No number | |
June | 22 | 10 More | |
October | 23 | 10 More | |
December | 24 | 10 More | |
1998 | February | Not released | |
June | 25 | 10 More | |
September | 26 | 10 More | |
December | 27 | 10 More | |
1999 | February | B | SuperPrep |
June | 28 | 10 More | |
October | 29 | The Next 10 | |
December | 30 | The Next 10 | |
2000 | February | C | SuperPrep |
June | 31 | The Next 10 | |
October | 32 | The Next 10 | |
December | 33 | The Next 10 | |
2001 | February | Not released | |
June | 34 | The Next 10 | |
October | 35 | The Next 10 | |
December | 36 | The Next 10 | |
2002 | February | Not released | |
June | 37 | The Next 10 |
|
October | 38 | The Next 10 |
|
December | 39 | PrepTest 39 | |
2003 | February | Not released | |
June | 40 | PrepTest 40 | |
October | 41 | PrepTest 41 | |
December | 42 | PrepTest 42 | |
2004 | February | Not released | |
June | 43 | PrepTest 43 | |
October | 44 | PrepTest 44 | |
December | 45 | PrepTest 45 | |
2005 | February | Not released | |
June | 46 | PrepTest 46 | |
October | 47 | PrepTest 47 | |
December | 48 | PrepTest 48 | |
2006 | February | Not released | |
June | 49 | PrepTest 49 | |
September | 50 | PrepTest 50 | |
December | 51 | PrepTest 51 | |
2007 | February | Not released | |
June | No number | Official Sample | |
September | 52 | PrepTest 52 | |
December | 53 | PrepTest 53 | |
2008 | February | Not released | |
June | 54 | PrepTest 54 | |
October | 55 | PrepTest 55 | |
December | 56 | PrepTest 56 | |
2009 | February | Not released | |
June | 57 | PrepTest 57 | |
September | 58 | PrepTest 58 | |
December | 59 | PrepTest 59 | |
2010 | February | Not released | |
June | 60 | PrepTest 60 | |
October | 61 | PrepTest 61 | |
December | 62 | PrepTest 62 |
Key
- 10 Actual — 10 Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests
- 10 More — 10 More Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests
- The Next 10 — The Next 10 Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests
- SuperPrep — The Official LSAT SuperPrep
- TriplePrep — LSAT TriplePrep, Volumes 1-3
- PrepTest — Individual PrepTests
Should I retake the LSAT?
If you think you can increase your score by 3 or more points, you should seriously consider retaking the LSAT. Even though schools no longer “need” to average your scores, they can if they want. Yale, Chicago, Cornell, and some other schools have said they won’t, for example, while NYU, Duke, Georgetown, and some others have said they will.
For most schools, however, whether they average depends largely on how well you do when you retake it. Consider these two students:
Vijay gets a 158 and then a 164.
Otto gets a 160 and then a 162.
The average for both Vijay and Otto is 161, but which average is better?
Most schools would likely peg Otto at a 161 and peg Vijay at a 164. Given the difference between Vijay’s first score and his second, his first score was probably a fluke or premature. Yet Otto’s 162 almost reaffirms his 160. The test makers themselves concede that the test has a margin of error of 3 points. So maybe Otto preformed exactly the same on each test but got a different result simply because the test is imperfect.
Vijay, on the other hand, might have gotten lucky, but probably not that lucky. His second score means something and should be given more weight than his first.
This example brings us back to our first sentence: If you’re likely to up by 3 or more points, you should seriously consider retaking. Granted, the more you go up, the better. By going up 6 points, for instance, Vijay made it easy for schools to disregard his first score. But even a 3-point leap can make a difference.
Just make sure you’re ready to make the leap!
For most schools, however, whether they average depends largely on how well you do when you retake it. Consider these two students:
Vijay gets a 158 and then a 164.
Otto gets a 160 and then a 162.
The average for both Vijay and Otto is 161, but which average is better?
Most schools would likely peg Otto at a 161 and peg Vijay at a 164. Given the difference between Vijay’s first score and his second, his first score was probably a fluke or premature. Yet Otto’s 162 almost reaffirms his 160. The test makers themselves concede that the test has a margin of error of 3 points. So maybe Otto preformed exactly the same on each test but got a different result simply because the test is imperfect.
Vijay, on the other hand, might have gotten lucky, but probably not that lucky. His second score means something and should be given more weight than his first.
This example brings us back to our first sentence: If you’re likely to up by 3 or more points, you should seriously consider retaking. Granted, the more you go up, the better. By going up 6 points, for instance, Vijay made it easy for schools to disregard his first score. But even a 3-point leap can make a difference.
Just make sure you’re ready to make the leap!